Whose Wages Should We Not Get To The Guiding Line?

"

Yesterday, the Jiangsu Provincial Department of human resources and social security issued the 2011 provincial enterprise wage guidance line.

It's hard to recruit workers. "

Just like soldiers who do not want to be generals are not good soldiers. For the salaried class, it is not normal that they do not want to raise their salaries.

Moreover, in the context of high housing prices, rising prices and constantly swallowing wage income, wages are not even spent, or even "Moonlight", which is a common phenomenon.

At this time, "raising wages" is actually not related to insatiable progress, but more is to maintain the standard of living, not to be left behind by CPI.

However, "wage increase" is obviously not only a working-class wishful thinking, but it has a salary negotiation mechanism. But since there is no compulsion, whether or not it will rise or rise will ultimately depend on the boss's face.

At this time, Jiangsu province not only does not set up an enterprise wage growth line, but also stipulates the bottom line of 6%-8%'s salary increase, and such a company's wage guidance line is really bright.

However, if we think that the wage growth is off the line, "raise wages" will be able to come to a successful conclusion.

In fact, although the wage guidance line is issued by the Provincial Department of human resources and social security, as an organ and department protecting the rights and interests of workers, of course, they have the right to speak in the interests of employees. However, as an administrative organ and an industry association, it can not provide concrete substantive protection for the wage guidance line, and the implementation of the "wage guidance line" still lacks the necessary prerequisite.

Specifically, if the wage guidance line really wants to become a wage increase, it will obviously depend on the specific implementation of this regulation by specific enterprises. However, since the "wage growth regulation" is only "guidance" instead of "coercion", for specific enterprises, due to the vastly different status of their respective battalions and the different decision-making concepts of enterprises, the extent to which this stipulation can be fulfilled can obviously be questioned.

If an enterprise refuses to accept the guidance of this wage increase rule and even refuses to comply with the wage increase on the downline, there are at least no solutions to these practical problems in the regulations.

In addition, a more realistic problem is that, for the enterprises with poor benefits, the minimum wage increase of 6% is "easy to say" though it is "easy to talk".

For enterprises with poor efficiency or even loss in operation, even their own business conditions are difficult to sustain. Cash flow is difficult to guarantee. Enterprises are unable to survive. Even if the enterprises really want to increase wages for their employees, I am afraid that they will not be able to make bricks without straw.

At this time, it is only for the enterprises to find ways to get rid of the real gold and silver.

And if the loss making enterprises with poor compulsory benefits "increase wages", they will not only become the last straw to crush the cash flow of enterprises, but even if enterprises fail to go bankrupt, they are likely to deal with layoffs, which should not be the original intention of the "wage growth line".

Not only that, even if the company is doing well, if the boss is reluctant to raise wages for employees, what is the countermeasure for the appeal salary guidance line?

A friend of mine is working in a foreign company in Nanjing. Affected by the financial crisis, not only has there been no increase in wages for several years, but this year's salary increase is only 3%. For such enterprises, how to implement the wage guidance line also needs to be questioned.

To put it in a nutshell, "at least 6% increase in wage growth" sounds very beautiful, and its starting point is also lack of goodwill. But such a "wage guidance line" is obviously not enough to ensure that the wage earners' income can catch up with CPI. As for the so-called "6% growth", if there is no increase, there is no place to cry out.

In this sense, in order to really achieve this goal of revenue growth, we need more practical measures and effective safeguards beyond the "wage guidance line".