Huang Yongjun: No One Can Really Guarantee The Fairness And Efficiency Of Marking.

A report from a southern media in June 15th. College entrance examination marking team "Shocked undergraduates" almost conveys the belief: how can undergraduates guarantee the quality of college entrance examination marking such a great event related to the future and destiny of candidates? So, who can guarantee the quality of the college entrance examination marking?

The regulations of the Ministry of education on the examination of the national unified examination for colleges and universities require: "the judges are mainly university teachers, and secondary school teachers or teaching and research staff are involved. Their ranks should be relatively stable. People who write non essays, such as compositions, should apply for a highly qualified and responsible teacher. Accordingly, if there are more postgraduates, including doctoral students, marking is irregularities, but the regulation itself does not prohibit a very few excellent undergraduate students from marking.

In fact, the question of marking the college entrance examination is no longer a new problem. The core of marking papers is how to ensure fairness in the short time of marking. We might as well ask: are university professors and doctoral students better than the professional counterparts in ensuring the fairness and efficiency of marking? There are two main factors that affect the quality of marking: one is ability, the other is attitude. Two. Under the clear and strict implementation of examination questions and marking system, academic qualifications are not the main factors affecting the quality of examination papers. In the case of the reader having certain ability, the attitude, the sense of responsibility and the strict and scientific marking process are even more important.

Here is another objective fact that we must note: a marking person may still make mistakes when he has strong ability and good attitude, because it is unfair for people to make mistakes. When a person wants to review hundreds of papers, how can we ensure that every test paper is judged fairly, especially for some subjective questions? At the same time, because many provinces and cities require the completion of the college entrance examination marking work in a week or so, such pressure and fatigue will aggravate the chance of errors in marking.

Therefore, it can be said that no one can really guarantee the marking. fair And efficiency! What should I do? This is perhaps a question that deserves our attention.

There are two basic trends in the reform of the college entrance examination system. Multiple enrollment "Two is" more than one year examination ", which is clearly stipulated in the outline of education plan. "More than one year test" means that more examination papers should be reviewed than that of a year, so the contradiction between efficiency and fairness will be sharper. "Multiple enrollment" is a necessary measure to promote the implementation of quality education in an all-round way. Here is a basic premise: no examination can test all the qualities of a person, and the college entrance examination can only test some of the cultural quality of a person. For example, in Chinese composition, the written expression ability is tested, but oral expression ability has no textual research. In today's society, oral expression ability is more important than written expression ability. Is the examinee with strong oral ability in the Chinese language test "eaten"? People's intelligence is pluralistic, and admission should also be pluralistic. As a universal examination for all candidates, it should be the examination of basic abilities and qualities of people. This is the starting point for the fairness of the college entrance examination.

Multiple entrance examination, standardized examination of scientific design, and holistic reform of the "sunshine" anti-corrosion system may be the proper perspective to answer and solve the marking problem. It is of practical significance to standardize and strictly enforce the marking system, even if it is to lower the efficiency and ensure better fairness.